# Interpretability Evaluation on ImageNet Inception-v3

Source: [Interpretability Evaluation on ImageNet Inception-v3](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-11T08:06:27.589Z

Evaluation of model interpretability methods on the ImageNet Inception-v3 dataset variant, measured using a comprehensive set of metrics including Coverage, Redundancy, Precision, Recall, F1, AP, mIoU, and specialized metrics M, S1, S2, and I1.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Interpretability Evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Inception-v3 |
| Metric | Coverage |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Coverage](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=Coverage>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Redundancy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=Redundancy>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Precision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=Precision>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=Recall>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (Average Precision)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=AP%20(Average%20Precision)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [M Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=M%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [S1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=S1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [S2 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=S2%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [mIoU (mean IoU)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=mIoU%20(mean%20IoU)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [I1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/interpretability-evaluation-on-imagenet-inception-v3.md?metric=I1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Coverage | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDDP-C | 93 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| EDDP-U | 90 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| EDDP-U | 87 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| EDDP-C | 86 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| EDDP-U | 86 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| EDDP-C | 85 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| PCA | 71 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| PCA | 70 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| NMF | 70 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| PCA | 68 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| NMF | 64 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |
| Natural | 63 | Not recorded | 68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8 |

### EDDP-C

Coverage: 93. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b617c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"2048"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDDP-U

Coverage: 90. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6177.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1792"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDDP-U

Coverage: 87. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6173.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1536"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDDP-C

Coverage: 86. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6178.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1792"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDDP-U

Coverage: 86. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b617b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"2048"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDDP-C

Coverage: 85. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6174.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1536"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA

Coverage: 71. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b617a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"2048"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA

Coverage: 70. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6171.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1536"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NMF

Coverage: 70. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6172.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a261e209131cea26614.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1536"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA

Coverage: 68. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6175.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1792"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NMF

Coverage: 64. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6176.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a261e209131cea26614.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"1792"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Natural

Coverage: 63. Result ID: 69b122806dbb7075b95b6179.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bb51e209131cea8a0b8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"I":"2048"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.