# Inpainting on ImageNet 100 images (val)

Source: [Inpainting on ImageNet 100 images (val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/inpainting-on-imagenet-100-images-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-19T08:59:58.642Z

Evaluation of image inpainting performance on the specific 100-image validation subset of the ImageNet dataset, measured using SSIM, LPIPS, and FID.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Inpainting |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet 100 images (val) |
| Metric | SSIM |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [SSIM](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/inpainting-on-imagenet-100-images-val.md?metric=SSIM>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [LPIPS](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/inpainting-on-imagenet-100-images-val.md?metric=LPIPS>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [FID](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/inpainting-on-imagenet-100-images-val.md?metric=FID>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | SSIM | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DAPS++ | 77.1 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DAPS++ | 76 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DAPS | 71.5 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DAPS | 69.3 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DDNM | 65.6 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DPS | 62.3 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DDRM | 60.2 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |
| DiffPIR | 50 | Not recorded | 6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc |

### DAPS++

SSIM: 77.1. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc97.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of function evaluations (NFEs)":"100","Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAPS++

SSIM: 76. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc96.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of function evaluations (NFEs)":"50","Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAPS

SSIM: 71.5. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc95.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa31e209131cea84481.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of function evaluations (NFEs)":"1000","Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAPS

SSIM: 69.3. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc94.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7aa31e209131cea84481.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Number of function evaluations (NFEs)":"100","Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DDNM

SSIM: 65.6. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc90.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e201e209131cea3dfb9.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/wyhuai/DDNM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DPS

SSIM: 62.3. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc93.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bdd1e209131cea8adbc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DDRM

SSIM: 60.2. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc91.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d9f1e209131cea3aea8.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/bahjat-kawar/ddrm>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DiffPIR

SSIM: 50. Result ID: 69bbbb0c47f34ce924a5bc92.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6923e657d6b0dd334292ecfc.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f5a1e209131cea45311.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Noise level (gamma)":"0.05"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.