# Info Gap Detection on CONCORD Evaluation Set

Source: [Info Gap Detection on CONCORD Evaluation Set](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/info-gap-detection-on-concord-evaluation-set>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-16T07:24:14.644Z

Evaluation of model performance on the CONCORD Evaluation Set for Info Gap Detection, measured by True Positive Rate (TPR) and False Positive Rate (FPR).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Info Gap Detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CONCORD Evaluation Set |
| Metric | False Positive Rate (FPR) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [False Positive Rate (FPR)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/info-gap-detection-on-concord-evaluation-set.md?metric=False%20Positive%20Rate%20(FPR)>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [True Positive Rate (TPR)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/info-gap-detection-on-concord-evaluation-set.md?metric=True%20Positive%20Rate%20(TPR)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | False Positive Rate (FPR) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CONCORD | 6.8 | Not recorded | 69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7 |
| CoT-SR | 19.5 | Not recorded | 69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7 |
| Zero-shot LLM | 22.8 | Not recorded | 69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7 |

### CONCORD

False Positive Rate (FPR): 6.8. Result ID: 69e08e9e47f34ce924c96eab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"framework":"CONCORD"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CoT-SR

False Positive Rate (FPR): 19.5. Result ID: 69e08e9e47f34ce924c96eaa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70cc1e209131cea4d38e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/noahshinn024/reflexion>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"strategy":"Chain of Thought with Sentence Retrieval","status":"SOTA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Zero-shot LLM

False Positive Rate (FPR): 22.8. Result ID: 69e08e9e47f34ce924c96ea9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06d1b7d0172140ec7cab7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"mode":"zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.