# Image Quality Assessment on ImageNet

Source: [Image Quality Assessment on ImageNet](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:53:10.708Z

Evaluation of image quality assessment models on the ImageNet dataset, measured using NIMA-based technical and aesthetic scoring metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Quality Assessment |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet |
| Metric | NIMA Technical Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [NIMA Technical Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet.md?metric=NIMA%20Technical%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [NIMA Aesthetic Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-quality-assessment-on-imagenet.md?metric=NIMA%20Aesthetic%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | NIMA Technical Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clean | 5.033 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |
| ACE | 5.008 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |
| NCF | 4.939 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |
| SAE | 4.924 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |
| ColorFool | 4.918 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |
| ReColorAdv | 4.886 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |
| cAdv | 4.718 | Not recorded | 68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f |

### Clean

NIMA Technical Score: 5.033. Result ID: 698fabbf3a6c314849faf867.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ACE

NIMA Technical Score: 5.008. Result ID: 698fabc03a6c314849faf86c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa682d1e209131cea1a8ba.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NCF

NIMA Technical Score: 4.939. Result ID: 698fabc03a6c314849faf86d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/ylhz/Natural-Color-Fool>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SAE

NIMA Technical Score: 4.924. Result ID: 698fabbf3a6c314849faf868.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64311e209131cea035f7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ColorFool

NIMA Technical Score: 4.918. Result ID: 698fabc03a6c314849faf86b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa675c1e209131cea15da8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReColorAdv

NIMA Technical Score: 4.886. Result ID: 698fabbf3a6c314849faf869.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66911e209131cea10f28.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### cAdv

NIMA Technical Score: 4.718. Result ID: 698fabbf3a6c314849faf86a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d931e209131cea3ac5f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67361e209131cea14d9b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.