# Image Classification Robustness on Cifar100 Source: [Image Classification Robustness on Cifar100]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-27T11:46:09.269Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Cifar100 dataset under various adversarial attack scenarios, reporting accuracy metrics for Clean data and specific attacks (AutoAttack, PGD). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Cifar100 | | Metric | Clean Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 9 of 9 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Clean Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Robust Accuracy (AutoAttack)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Robust Accuracy (PGD)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Clean Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CLIP | 60.47 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | CLIP | 60.45 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | FARE | 59.85 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | UCAT | 58.11 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | UCAT | 54.45 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | TeCoA | 49.68 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | DKL | 35.61 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | ACAT | 34.71 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | | TRADES | 34.38 | Not recorded | 6940e7a8456146936284f897 | ### CLIP Clean Accuracy: 60.47. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e78852. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Fine-tuning dataset":"TinyImageNet","Adversarial training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CLIP Clean Accuracy: 60.45. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e788a1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training Data":"ImageNet-1k","Adversarial Training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FARE Clean Accuracy: 59.85. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e788a3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training Data":"ImageNet-1k","Adversarial Training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UCAT Clean Accuracy: 58.11. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e788a4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training Data":"ImageNet-1k","Adversarial Training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UCAT Clean Accuracy: 54.45. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e78856. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Fine-tuning dataset":"TinyImageNet","Adversarial training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TeCoA Clean Accuracy: 49.68. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e788a2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training Data":"ImageNet-1k","Adversarial Training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DKL Clean Accuracy: 35.61. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e78855. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Fine-tuning dataset":"TinyImageNet","Adversarial training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ACAT Clean Accuracy: 34.71. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e78854. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Fine-tuning dataset":"TinyImageNet","Adversarial training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TRADES Clean Accuracy: 34.38. Result ID: 69a183f135dfcabb00e78853. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Fine-tuning dataset":"TinyImageNet","Adversarial training":"2-step PGD","Epsilon":"1/255","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.