# Image Classification on Waterbirds (test) (Bias Severity Accuracy)

Source: [Image Classification on Waterbirds (test) (Bias Severity Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-waterbirds-test-bias-severity-accuracy>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:36:03.422Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the Waterbirds dataset, specifically reporting Average Accuracy metrics across various bias severity thresholds (0.5% to 5.0%).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Waterbirds (test) |
| Metric | Avg Acc (0.5% Bias) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Avg Acc (0.5% Bias)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-waterbirds-test-bias-severity-accuracy.md?metric=Avg%20Acc%20(0.5%25%20Bias)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Avg Acc (1.0% Bias)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-waterbirds-test-bias-severity-accuracy.md?metric=Avg%20Acc%20(1.0%25%20Bias)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Avg Acc (2.0% Bias)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-waterbirds-test-bias-severity-accuracy.md?metric=Avg%20Acc%20(2.0%25%20Bias)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Avg Acc (5.0% Bias)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-waterbirds-test-bias-severity-accuracy.md?metric=Avg%20Acc%20(5.0%25%20Bias)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Avg Acc (0.5% Bias) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Intrinsic Feature Guidance | 63.64 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| LfF+BE | 61.22 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| LfF | 60.66 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| DisEnt | 59.59 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| LNL | 58.49 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| EnD | 58.47 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| HEX | 57.88 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| Vanilla | 57.41 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| ReBias | 55.44 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |
| DisEnt+BE | 51.65 | Not recorded | 68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e |

### Intrinsic Feature Guidance

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 63.64. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF+BE

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 61.22. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e201e209131cea3df92.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 60.66. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DisEnt

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 59.59. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b191e209131cea2c2bc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LNL

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 58.49. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340cf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa659e1e209131cea0b3bb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EnD

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 58.47. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e481e209131cea3ef48.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HEX

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 57.88. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340ce.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65861e209131cea0ad27.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 57.41. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340cd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62321e209131ce9f8328.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 55.44. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DisEnt+BE

Avg Acc (0.5% Bias): 51.65. Result ID: 699309e53a6c3148491340d5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73b21e209131cea5df8e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e201e209131cea3df92.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
