# Image Classification on TVHL-DME Ophthalmology OCT

Source: [Image Classification on TVHL-DME Ophthalmology OCT](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-tvhl-dme-ophthalmology-oct>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-13T08:20:49.902Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the TVHL-DME Ophthalmology OCT dataset, reporting Accuracy (ACC) and AUC.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | TVHL-DME Ophthalmology OCT |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-tvhl-dme-ophthalmology-oct.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AUC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-tvhl-dme-ophthalmology-oct.md?metric=AUC>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| M-IDoL | 98.21 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| RETFound | 97.86 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| MIRAGE | 96.42 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| MIM-OCT | 92.71 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |

### M-IDoL

Accuracy: 98.21. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38c8f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RETFound

Accuracy: 97.86. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38c8c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MIRAGE

Accuracy: 96.42. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38c8e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7ba21e209131cea8983f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MIM-OCT

Accuracy: 92.71. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38c8d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73451e209131cea5b74c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
