# Image Classification on STL-10 (Label Count Specific Error Rates) Source: [Image Classification on STL-10 (Label Count Specific Error Rates)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:42:21.777Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the STL-10 dataset, reporting error rates derived from specific subsets of 40, 250, and 1000 labels. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | STL-10 | | Metric | Error Rate (40 Labels) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Error Rate (40 Labels)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Error Rate (250 Labels)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Error Rate (1000 Labels)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Error Rate (40 Labels) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CoMatch + EPASS | 9.15 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | CoMatch | 13.74 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | SimMatch + EPASS | 15.71 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | SimMatch | 16.98 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | AdaMatch | 19.95 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | SoftMatch | 22.23 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | ReMixMatch | 27.87 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | FreeMatch | 28.5 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | FlexMatch | 29.12 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | FixMatch | 38.19 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | Dash | 42 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | MixMatch | 52.32 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | UDA | 53.69 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | ### CoMatch + EPASS Error Rate (40 Labels): 9.15. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db38. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CoMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 13.74. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db33. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimMatch + EPASS Error Rate (40 Labels): 15.71. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db39. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 16.98. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db34. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AdaMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 19.95. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db35. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SoftMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 22.23. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db37. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReMixMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 27.87. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db2f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FreeMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 28.5. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db36. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FlexMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 29.12. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db31. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FixMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 38.19. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db30. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Dash Error Rate (40 Labels): 42. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db32. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MixMatch Error Rate (40 Labels): 52.32. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db2e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UDA Error Rate (40 Labels): 53.69. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db2d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.