# Image Classification on Stanford Cars (Robust Accuracy)

Source: [Image Classification on Stanford Cars (Robust Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-stanford-cars-robust-accuracy>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-23T07:35:03.935Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Stanford Cars dataset, reporting Robust Accuracy, typically under adversarial conditions.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Stanford Cars |
| Metric | Robust Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Robust Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-stanford-cars-robust-accuracy.md?metric=Robust%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Robust Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ours (5 trees) | 22.25 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |
| AoS | 21.25 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |
| Ours | 20.88 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |
| FARE | 17.44 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |
| PMG-FT | 16.74 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |
| TeCoA | 13.08 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |
| CLIP | 0.27 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 |

### Ours (5 trees)

Robust Accuracy: 22.25. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e33.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255","Number of trees":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### AoS

Robust Accuracy: 21.25. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e31.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ours

Robust Accuracy: 20.88. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e32.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FARE

Robust Accuracy: 17.44. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e30.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa738c1e209131cea5d24a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PMG-FT

Robust Accuracy: 16.74. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e2f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72df1e209131cea5912e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TeCoA

Robust Accuracy: 13.08. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e2e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f271e209131cea44177.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CLIP

Robust Accuracy: 0.27. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09e2d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e85bd47d0172140ec81123.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Zero-shot":"true","Adversarial fine-tuning":"ImageNet","PGD attack steps":"20","Perturbation radius (epsilon)":"1/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
