# Image Classification on RNSA Radiology X-ray

Source: [Image Classification on RNSA Radiology X-ray](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-rnsa-radiology-x-ray>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-13T08:20:50.160Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the RNSA Radiology X-ray dataset, measured using Accuracy (ACC) and AUC.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | RNSA Radiology X-ray |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-rnsa-radiology-x-ray.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AUC](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-rnsa-radiology-x-ray.md?metric=AUC>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AFiRe | 86.42 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| M-IDoL | 85.13 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| PCRLv2 | 84.88 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| DiRA | 83.64 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |
| Adam | 82.79 | Not recorded | 69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7 |

### AFiRe

Accuracy: 86.42. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38cc6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa78361e209131cea773e4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### M-IDoL

Accuracy: 85.13. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38cc7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCRLv2

Accuracy: 84.88. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38cc5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DiRA

Accuracy: 83.64. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38cc3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c571e209131cea3367b.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/JLiangLab/DiRA>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Adam

Accuracy: 82.79. Result ID: 69dca75447f34ce924c38cc4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785b7d0172140ec788c7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72f71e209131cea599f1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Mode":"Fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.