# Image Classification on Photo-Art-50 (train-test)

Source: [Image Classification on Photo-Art-50 (train-test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-photo-art-50-train-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:54:23.206Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Photo-Art-50 dataset using the combined train and test splits, typically measured using overall, art-specific, and photo-specific accuracy scores.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Photo-Art-50 (train-test) |
| Metric | Overall Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Overall Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-photo-art-50-train-test.md?metric=Overall%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Art Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-photo-art-50-train-test.md?metric=Art%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Photo Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-photo-art-50-train-test.md?metric=Photo%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Overall Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SwiDeN | 93.02 | Not recorded | 68fa62a41e209131ce9fa827 |
| Wu et al. | 89.67 | Not recorded | 68fa62a41e209131ce9fa827 |

### SwiDeN

Overall Accuracy: 93.02. Result ID: 698bdf0eecace47ef5596862.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62a41e209131ce9fa827.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62a41e209131ce9fa827.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/val-iisc/swiden>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"ARCH.":"SwiDeN (Ours)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Wu et al.

Overall Accuracy: 89.67. Result ID: 698bdf0eecace47ef5596861.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62a41e209131ce9fa827.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"ARCH.":"Wu et al."}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.