# Image Classification on Oxford Flowers (F1-Score)

Source: [Image Classification on Oxford Flowers (F1-Score)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-oxford-flowers-f1-score>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-27T11:48:41.745Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Oxford Flowers dataset, reporting F1-Score.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Oxford Flowers |
| Metric | F1 Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-oxford-flowers-f1-score.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | F1 Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LSQMM | 91.68 | Not recorded | 6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9 |
| MLRSTM | 90.28 | Not recorded | 6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9 |
| SMM | 89.03 | Not recorded | 6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9 |
| LIBSVM | 88.83 | Not recorded | 6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9 |
| TT-MMK | 85.26 | Not recorded | 6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9 |

### LSQMM

F1 Score: 91.68. Result ID: 69a1848835dfcabb00e78d24.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MLRSTM

F1 Score: 90.28. Result ID: 69a1848835dfcabb00e78d23.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SMM

F1 Score: 89.03. Result ID: 69a1848835dfcabb00e78d21.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LIBSVM

F1 Score: 88.83. Result ID: 69a1848835dfcabb00e78d20.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TT-MMK

F1 Score: 85.26. Result ID: 69a1848835dfcabb00e78d22.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6938fe7b6cfd488761a53bb9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa585a1e209131ce9ad5e1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
