# Image Classification on Oxford Flowers 102 (Base/Novel/HM Metrics) Source: [Image Classification on Oxford Flowers 102 (Base/Novel/HM Metrics)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-18T09:09:46.481Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Oxford Flowers 102 dataset, specifically reporting Base, Novel, and Harmonic Mean (HM) metrics, suggesting a few-shot or generalization evaluation setup. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Oxford Flowers 102 | | Metric | Base Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Base Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Novel Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [HM Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Base Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | HPT | 98.17 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | P-SRC | 98.07 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | MMA | 97.77 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | ProDA | 97.7 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | CoOp | 97.6 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | LwEIB | 97.53 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | HeBA | 97.37 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | LASP-V | 97.17 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | MaPLe | 95.92 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | KgCoOp | 95 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | CoOpOp | 94.87 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | RPO | 94.13 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | | CLIP | 72.08 | Not recorded | 69ba31930636e5bf4afc08c3 | ### HPT Base Accuracy: 98.17. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f72. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### P-SRC Base Accuracy: 98.07. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f71. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2023"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MMA Base Accuracy: 97.77. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f73. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ProDA Base Accuracy: 97.7. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f6c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2022"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CoOp Base Accuracy: 97.6. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f6a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2022"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LwEIB Base Accuracy: 97.53. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f74. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2025"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HeBA Base Accuracy: 97.37. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f75. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"Ours"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LASP-V Base Accuracy: 97.17. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f6f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2023"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MaPLe Base Accuracy: 95.92. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f6e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2023"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### KgCoOp Base Accuracy: 95. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f6d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2023"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CoOpOp Base Accuracy: 94.87. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f6b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2022"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RPO Base Accuracy: 94.13. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f70. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2023"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CLIP Base Accuracy: 72.08. Result ID: 69ba6bbc47f34ce924a48f69. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2021"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.