# Image Classification on NATS-Bench CIFAR-100 TSS (test) Source: [Image Classification on NATS-Bench CIFAR-100 TSS (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-04T08:57:34.077Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the NATS-Bench CIFAR-100 TSS subset. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | NATS-Bench CIFAR-100 TSS (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Time (s)](): Lower is better; unit: TIME. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | FreeREA | 73.51 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | FreeREA + Latency | 73.51 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | GA-NINASWOT | 71.57 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | TENAS | 71.24 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | NASI | 71.2 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | EPE-NAS | 69.58 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | NASWOT (1000) | 69.1 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | | FreeREA + Memory | 49.67 | Not recorded | 69a66bdc2d603e6de3e3cc9a | ### FreeREA Accuracy: 73.51. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0cd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FreeREA + Latency Accuracy: 73.51. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0ce. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Constraint":"Latency","Evaluator":"SEval-NAS"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GA-NINASWOT Accuracy: 71.57. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0cb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TENAS Accuracy: 71.24. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0c9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NASI Accuracy: 71.2. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0ca. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EPE-NAS Accuracy: 69.58. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0cc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NASWOT (1000) Accuracy: 69.1. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0c8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Trials":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FreeREA + Memory Accuracy: 49.67. Result ID: 69a7f3f36dbb7075b94cf0cf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Constraint":"Memory","Evaluator":"SEval-NAS"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.