# Image Classification on MNIST (ID Acc/ID Cov)

Source: [Image Classification on MNIST (ID Acc/ID Cov)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mnist-id-acc-id-cov>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-05T08:20:10.929Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the MNIST dataset, reporting Identification Accuracy (ID Acc) and Identification Coverage (ID Cov).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | MNIST |
| Metric | ID Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 9 of 9 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [ID Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mnist-id-acc-id-cov.md?metric=ID%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ID Coverage](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mnist-id-acc-id-cov.md?metric=ID%20Coverage>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | ID Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| EDL++ | 99.98 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| C-EDL | 99.98 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| EDL++ | 99.97 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| C-EDL | 99.96 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| MC-Dropout | 99.94 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| Standard Network | 99.8 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| ABNN | 99.78 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| EMM | 99.55 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |
| EDL-Head | 99.43 | Not recorded | 68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2 |

### EDL++

ID Accuracy: 99.98. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Method":"MC"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### C-EDL

ID Accuracy: 99.98. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Method":"MC"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDL++

ID Accuracy: 99.97. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295da.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Method":"Meta"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### C-EDL

ID Accuracy: 99.96. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295db.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Inference Method":"Meta"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MC-Dropout

ID Accuracy: 99.94. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62d31e209131ce9fb5ff.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Standard Network

ID Accuracy: 99.8. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ABNN

ID Accuracy: 99.78. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71ad1e209131cea527f6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EMM

ID Accuracy: 99.55. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e2b1e209131cea3e464.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDL-Head

ID Accuracy: 99.43. Result ID: 69a93ca86dbb7075b95295d6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa792d1e209131cea7c6c2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65021e209131cea07d7f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
