# Image Classification on MNIST Dir 0.8 60k (test)

Source: [Image Classification on MNIST Dir 0.8 60k (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mnist-dir-0-8-60k-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-25T07:27:12.172Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the MNIST dataset corrupted by Dirichlet noise with parameter 0.8 (60k samples), using the test split.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | MNIST Dir 0.8 60k (test) |
| Metric | Top-1 Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Top-1 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-mnist-dir-0-8-60k-test.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FedAvg | 98.52 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 |
| FibFL++ | 94.25 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 |
| FedRep | 93.89 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 |
| FibFL+ | 88.19 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 |
| RDFL | 87.72 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 |
| FibFL | 87.61 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 |

### FedAvg

Top-1 Accuracy: 98.52. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac61e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":"10","R":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FibFL++

Top-1 Accuracy: 94.25. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac623.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":"10","R":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedRep

Top-1 Accuracy: 93.89. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac61f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa5a3d1e209131ce9be169.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":"10","R":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FibFL+

Top-1 Accuracy: 88.19. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac622.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":"10","R":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RDFL

Top-1 Accuracy: 87.72. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac620.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":"10","R":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FibFL

Top-1 Accuracy: 87.61. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac621.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":"10","R":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
