# Image Classification on Inst. CIFAR10 (test)

Source: [Image Classification on Inst. CIFAR10 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-inst-cifar10-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:32.197Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Inst. CIFAR10 test set, measured using accuracy under varying eta levels (0.2, 0.4, 0.6).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Inst. CIFAR10 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (eta=0.2) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 11 of 11 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (eta=0.2)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-inst-cifar10-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(eta%3D0.2)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (eta=0.4)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-inst-cifar10-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(eta%3D0.4)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (eta=0.6)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-inst-cifar10-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(eta%3D0.6)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (eta=0.2) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CAL | 92.01 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| CORES^2 | 91.14 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| Reweight-R | 90.04 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| Co-teaching+ | 89.8 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| Peer Loss | 89.12 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| Co-teaching | 88.87 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| JoCoR | 88.78 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| LDMI | 88.57 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| Forward T | 87.22 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| L\_q | 85.81 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |
| CE (Standard) | 85.45 | Not recorded | 68fa69991e209131cea22f22 |

### CAL

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 92.01. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bcc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/CAL>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CORES^2

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 91.14. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bcb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/cores>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Reweight-R

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 90.04. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66d21e209131cea129ce.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Co-teaching+

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 89.8. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Peer Loss

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 89.12. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68261e209131cea1a45a.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/gohsyi/PeerLoss>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Co-teaching

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 88.87. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa64fe1e209131cea07aa4.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/bhanML/Co-teaching>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### JoCoR

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 88.78. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67711e209131cea164c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LDMI

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 88.57. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Forward T

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 87.22. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63321e209131ce9fd4c8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### L\_q

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 85.81. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa651f1e209131cea088eb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CE (Standard)

Accuracy (eta=0.2): 85.45. Result ID: 698dbf388b517eb433237bc2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69991e209131cea22f22.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
