# Image Classification on ImageSquawk 128x128 (test)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageSquawk 128x128 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagesquawk-128x128-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:30:19.875Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the 128x128 version of the ImageSquawk dataset, reporting accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageSquawk 128x128 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 9 of 9 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagesquawk-128x128-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Whole Dataset | 87.5 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| NCFM | 72.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| MTT | 52.3 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| DM | 50.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| NCFM | 41.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| Random | 40.2 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| MTT | 39.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| DM | 31.2 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |
| Random | 21.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77281e209131cea71713 |

### Whole Dataset

Accuracy: 87.5. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b6c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Percent":"100%","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NCFM

Accuracy: 72.8. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b6b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"10","Ratio (%)":"0.77","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MTT

Accuracy: 52.3. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b69.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0d1e209131cea31ba0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"10","Ratio (%)":"0.77","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DM

Accuracy: 50.4. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b6a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e3d1e209131cea3e924.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"10","Ratio (%)":"0.77","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NCFM

Accuracy: 41.6. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b67.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"1","Ratio (%)":"0.077","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

Accuracy: 40.2. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b68.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"10","Ratio (%)":"0.77","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MTT

Accuracy: 39.4. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b65.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0d1e209131cea31ba0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"1","Ratio (%)":"0.077","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DM

Accuracy: 31.2. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b66.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e3d1e209131cea3e924.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"1","Ratio (%)":"0.077","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random

Accuracy: 21.8. Result ID: 69946b593a6c3148491d1b64.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77281e209131cea71713.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"IPC":"1","Ratio (%)":"0.077","Resolution":"128x128"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.