# Image Classification on Imagenette (% mean score (s))

Source: [Image Classification on Imagenette (% mean score (s))](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenette-percent-mean-score-s>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:52:23.830Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Imagenette dataset, measured using the '% mean score (s)' metric.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Imagenette |
| Metric | Mean Score (%) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Mean Score (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenette-percent-mean-score-s.md?metric=Mean%20Score%20(%25)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Mean Score (%) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CLIP | 99.59 | Not recorded | 68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c |
| NOVIC (FT9) | 99.44 | Not recorded | 68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c |
| NOVIC (FT2) | 99.32 | Not recorded | 68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c |
| NOVIC (FT6) | 99.27 | Not recorded | 68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c |
| NOVIC (FT0) | 99.23 | Not recorded | 68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c |

### CLIP

Mean Score (%): 99.59. Result ID: 699577b53badfaffe66e386c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NOVIC (FT9)

Mean Score (%): 99.44. Result ID: 699577b53badfaffe66e386d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot","Frequency Threshold":9}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NOVIC (FT2)

Mean Score (%): 99.32. Result ID: 699577b53badfaffe66e386f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot","Frequency Threshold":2}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NOVIC (FT6)

Mean Score (%): 99.27. Result ID: 699577b53badfaffe66e386e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot","Frequency Threshold":6}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NOVIC (FT0)

Mean Score (%): 99.23. Result ID: 699577b53badfaffe66e3870.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77fe1e209131cea7647c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot","Frequency Threshold":0}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.