# Image Classification on ImageNet30 (test) Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet30 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:36:01.478Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the ImageNet30 dataset, measured using averaged accuracy across six severity levels (0 to 5). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet30 (test) | | Metric | Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 6 of 6 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Averaged Accuracy (Severity 1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Averaged Accuracy (Severity 2)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Averaged Accuracy (Severity 3)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Averaged Accuracy (Severity 4)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Averaged Accuracy (Severity 5)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | EIIL | 88.2 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | SharpDRO | 87.5 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | JTT | 87.3 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | SharpDRO | 87.1 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | JTT | 86.5 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | EIIL | 85.5 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | ### EIIL Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0): 88.2. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c4e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Gaussian"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SharpDRO Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0): 87.5. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c4f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Gaussian"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### JTT Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0): 87.3. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c4d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Gaussian"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SharpDRO Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0): 87.1. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c52. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### JTT Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0): 86.5. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c50. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EIIL Averaged Accuracy (Severity 0): 85.5. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c51. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.