# Image Classification on ImageNet (test) (Unpruned Top-1)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet (test) (Unpruned Top-1)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-unpruned-top-1>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:07:54.402Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of ImageNet, reporting Top-1 accuracy metrics, including the unpruned baseline.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet (test) |
| Metric | Unpruned Top-1 Acc |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Unpruned Top-1 Acc](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-unpruned-top-1.md?metric=Unpruned%20Top-1%20Acc>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Acc](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-unpruned-top-1.md?metric=Top-1%20Acc>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Unpruned Top-1 Acc | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| PFEC + CLR | 76.15 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |
| PFEC + CLR | 76.15 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |
| PFP (lowest top-1 err.) | 76.13 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |
| PFP (within 1.0% top-1) | 76.13 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |

### PFEC + CLR

Unpruned Top-1 Acc: 76.15. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a666.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-50","Param reduction %":18.1}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PFEC + CLR

Unpruned Top-1 Acc: 76.15. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a668.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-50","Param reduction %":44.3}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PFP (lowest top-1 err.)

Unpruned Top-1 Acc: 76.13. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a665.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67411e209131cea15471.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-50","Param reduction %":18,"FLOPs reduction %":10.8}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PFP (within 1.0% top-1)

Unpruned Top-1 Acc: 76.13. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a667.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67411e209131cea15471.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-50","Param reduction %":44,"FLOPs reduction %":30.1}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.