# Image Classification on ImageNet (test) (Accuracy and Communication Overhead)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet (test) (Accuracy and Communication Overhead)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-accuracy-and-communication-overhead>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:07:01.794Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of ImageNet, reporting standard Top-1 Accuracy alongside communication efficiency metrics (Online and Total Communication volume).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet (test) |
| Metric | Top-1 Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Top-1 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-accuracy-and-communication-overhead.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Online Communication Volume (GB)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-accuracy-and-communication-overhead.md?metric=Online%20Communication%20Volume%20(GB)>): Lower is better; unit: SIZE.

- [Total Communication Volume (GB)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-test-accuracy-and-communication-overhead.md?metric=Total%20Communication%20Volume%20(GB)>): Lower is better; unit: SIZE.

## Recorded results

| Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CoPriv | 70.58 | Not recorded | 68fa710e1e209131cea4eed2 |
| \[33\] | 69.1 | Not recorded | 68fa710e1e209131cea4eed2 |

### CoPriv

Top-1 Accuracy: 70.58. Result ID: 699191a83a6c314849090da5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa710e1e209131cea4eed2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa710e1e209131cea4eed2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### \[33\]

Top-1 Accuracy: 69.1. Result ID: 699191a83a6c314849090da4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa710e1e209131cea4eed2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f241e209131cea43fd2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
