# Image Classification on ImageNet-P (Corruption Robustness)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet-P (Corruption Robustness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-10T07:55:04.319Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the ImageNet-P dataset, reporting accuracy under various noise, blur, and geometric corruption conditions.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet-P |
| Metric | Accuracy (Gaussian Noise) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 14 of 14 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (Gaussian Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-5 Accuracy (Avg)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-5%20Accuracy%20(Avg)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Shot Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Shot%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Speckle Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Speckle%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Motion Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Motion%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Zoom Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Zoom%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Gaussian Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Snow)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Snow)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Spatter)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Spatter)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Brightness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Brightness)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Translate)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Translate)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Rotate)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Rotate)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Tilt)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Tilt)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Scale)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Scale)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Shear)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Shear)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Gaussian Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Shot Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Shot%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Speckle Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Speckle%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Motion Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Motion%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Zoom Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Zoom%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Gaussian Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Snow)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Snow)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Spatter)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Spatter)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Brightness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Brightness)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Translate)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Translate)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Rotate)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Rotate)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Tilt)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Tilt)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Scale)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Scale)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Shear)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Shear)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (Avg)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-p-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(Avg)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (Gaussian Noise) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MoCo-v3 + SER | 89.96 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |
| MoCo-v3 + E-SSL | 89.6 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |
| MoCo-v3 + EquiMod | 88.78 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |
| MoCo-v3 + SER | 88.62 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |
| MoCo-v3 | 87.75 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |
| MoCo-v3 + AugSelf | 87.58 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |
| MoCo-v3 + STL | 86.67 | Not recorded | 69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01 |

### MoCo-v3 + SER

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 89.96. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec4a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3","variant":"‡"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MoCo-v3 + E-SSL

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 89.6. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec49.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa414d1e209131ce8fa063.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3","variant":"‡"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MoCo-v3 + EquiMod

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 88.78. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec48.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3","variant":"†"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MoCo-v3 + SER

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 88.62. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec47.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MoCo-v3

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 87.75. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec44.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa673f1e209131cea15344.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/facebookresearch/moco>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MoCo-v3 + AugSelf

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 87.58. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec45.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b421e209131cea2d01e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/hankook/AugSelf>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MoCo-v3 + STL

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 86.67. Result ID: 69afce3c6dbb7075b957ec46.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69afa57f2d603e6de3e43a01.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa769a1e209131cea6e137.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Base Algorithm":"MoCo-v3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
