# Image Classification on ImageNet (Corruption Robustness Metrics)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet (Corruption Robustness Metrics)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-27T08:00:05.575Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the standard ImageNet dataset, focusing on robustness metrics derived from common image corruptions (e.g., Hue, Saturation, Brightness, Contrast) and specific perturbation metrics (l-infinity norms).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet |
| Metric | Accuracy (Clean) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (Clean)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Clean)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Hue Corruption)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Hue%20Corruption)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Saturation Corruption)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Saturation%20Corruption)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Rotation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Rotation)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Brightness Corruption)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Brightness%20Corruption)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Contrast Corruption)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Contrast%20Corruption)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (L-inf, 20-step)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(L-inf%2C%2020-step)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Auto L-inf)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-corruption-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Auto%20L-inf)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (Clean) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Normal | 0 | Not recorded | 68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343 |
| Madry | 0 | Not recorded | 68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343 |
| Fast-AT | 0 | Not recorded | 68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343 |
| GAT-f | 0 | Not recorded | 68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343 |

### Normal

Accuracy (Clean): 0. Result ID: 69a14ef535dfcabb00e62742.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training":"Normal†"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Madry

Accuracy (Clean): 0. Result ID: 69a14ef535dfcabb00e62743.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa665a1e209131cea0fbae.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training":"Madry†∞"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Fast-AT

Accuracy (Clean): 0. Result ID: 69a14ef535dfcabb00e62744.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66e51e209131cea12efc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training":"Fast-AT†∞"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GAT-f

Accuracy (Clean): 0. Result ID: 69a14ef535dfcabb00e62745.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ecc1e209131cea42343.md>)

[Implementation](<https://hsiung.cc/CARBEN/>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Training":"GAT-f†"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
