# Image Classification on ImageNet-C Overall Average (7x5 Severities)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet-C Overall Average (7x5 Severities)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-c-overall-average-7x5-severities>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-19T09:09:06.363Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the ImageNet-C dataset, reporting the overall average metric calculated across 7 corruption types evaluated at 5 severity levels.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet-C overall (mean over 7 corruptions x 5 severities) |
| Metric | Top-1 Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Top-1 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-c-overall-average-7x5-severities.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [NLL (Cross-Entropy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-c-overall-average-7x5-severities.md?metric=NLL%20(Cross-Entropy)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [ECE](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-c-overall-average-7x5-severities.md?metric=ECE>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DropBlock | 39 | Not recorded | 69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea |
| IID Gaussian | 38.8 | Not recorded | 69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea |
| Corr. Gaussian | 38.6 | Not recorded | 69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea |
| Dropout | 38.4 | Not recorded | 69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea |
| GCh | 38.3 | Not recorded | 69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea |
| None | 38.2 | Not recorded | 69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea |

### DropBlock

Top-1 Accuracy: 39. Result ID: 69bbbd2d47f34ce924a5cecc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65011e209131cea07ccb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"g":"0.1","Injection Stage":"late-stage"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### IID Gaussian

Top-1 Accuracy: 38.8. Result ID: 69bbbd2d47f34ce924a5cecd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"g":"0.1","Injection Stage":"late-stage"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Corr. Gaussian

Top-1 Accuracy: 38.6. Result ID: 69bbbd2d47f34ce924a5cece.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"g":"0.1","Injection Stage":"late-stage"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Dropout

Top-1 Accuracy: 38.4. Result ID: 69bbbd2d47f34ce924a5cecb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"g":"0.1","Injection Stage":"late-stage"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GCh

Top-1 Accuracy: 38.3. Result ID: 69bbbd2d47f34ce924a5cecf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"g":"0.1","Injection Stage":"late-stage"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### None

Top-1 Accuracy: 38.2. Result ID: 69bbbd2d47f34ce924a5ceca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69bb831d0636e5bf4afc1aea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"g":"0","Injection Stage":"late-stage"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
