# Image Classification on ImageNet (Accuracy and Sparsity)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet (Accuracy and Sparsity)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-accuracy-and-sparsity>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:29:49.204Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the standard ImageNet dataset, measuring accuracy alongside model sparsity.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-accuracy-and-sparsity.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Sparsity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-accuracy-and-sparsity.md?metric=Sparsity>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CLIP Embeddings-H | 79.4 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CF-CBM-L | 78.45 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CF-CBM-H | 77.4 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-H | 76.55 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| Baseline (Images) | 76.13 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-H | 75.22 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| Label-Free CBMs | 71.98 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CLIP Embeddings-L | 62.85 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-L | 58.2 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-L | 49.2 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |

### CLIP Embeddings-H

Accuracy: 79.4. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ffb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Non-Interpretable","Concepts":false,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CF-CBM-L

Accuracy: 78.45. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849136003.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Patches Low Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CF-CBM-H

Accuracy: 77.4. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849136000.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-H

Accuracy: 76.55. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135fff.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Baseline (Images)

Accuracy: 76.13. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ffa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6fa01e209131cea46b96.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Non-Interpretable","Concepts":false,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-H

Accuracy: 75.22. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ffe.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Label-Free CBMs

Accuracy: 71.98. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ffd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6fa01e209131cea46b96.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CLIP Embeddings-L

Accuracy: 62.85. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ffc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Non-Interpretable","Concepts":false,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-L

Accuracy: 58.2. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849136002.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Patches Low Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-L

Accuracy: 49.2. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849136001.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Patches Low Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
