# Image Classification on ImageNet 50 1K-subset (test)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet 50 1K-subset (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-50-1k-subset-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-27T13:19:42.752Z

Evaluation of standard Image Classification performance (Top-1, Top-5, Top-10 Accuracy) on the specific test split of the ImageNet 50 1K-subset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet 50 1K-subset (test) |
| Metric | Top-1 Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Top-1 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-50-1k-subset-test.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-5 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-50-1k-subset-test.md?metric=Top-5%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-10 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-50-1k-subset-test.md?metric=Top-10%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ours | 22.1 | Not recorded | 69c60f300636e5bf4afc8644 |
| LoRS | 18.6 | Not recorded | 69c60f300636e5bf4afc8644 |

### Ours

Top-1 Accuracy: 22.1. Result ID: 69c683db47f34ce924b09e8e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c60f300636e5bf4afc8644.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c60f300636e5bf4afc8644.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Distillation budget":"499 pairs","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot classification"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LoRS

Top-1 Accuracy: 18.6. Result ID: 69c683db47f34ce924b09e8d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69c60f300636e5bf4afc8644.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa738c1e209131cea5d273.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Distillation budget":"499 pairs","Evaluation protocol":"Zero-shot classification"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.