# Image Classification on ImageNet-1K (val) (Adversarial Robustness Profile)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet-1K (val) (Adversarial Robustness Profile)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-val-adversarial-robustness-profile>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:39:17.259Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the validation split of ImageNet-1K, reporting clean accuracy alongside robustness metrics against various adversarial attacks including PGD, CW, and APGD variants.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet-1K (val) |
| Metric | Clean Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Clean Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-val-adversarial-robustness-profile.md?metric=Clean%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [PGD Robust Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-val-adversarial-robustness-profile.md?metric=PGD%20Robust%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [CW Robust Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-val-adversarial-robustness-profile.md?metric=CW%20Robust%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [APGD-DLR Robust Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-val-adversarial-robustness-profile.md?metric=APGD-DLR%20Robust%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [APGD-CE Robust Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-val-adversarial-robustness-profile.md?metric=APGD-CE%20Robust%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Clean Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| TAPADL-FAN | 84.3 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| FAN-B-AdaNCA | 84.1 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| FAN-B | 83.9 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| Swin-B-AdaNCA | 83.7 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| Swin-B | 83.4 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| RVT-B-AdaNCA | 83.3 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| Swin-B | 83.3 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| ConViT-B-AdaNCA | 83.2 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| TAPADL-RVT | 83.1 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| RVT-B | 82.7 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| ConViT-B | 82.7 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |
| ConViT-B | 82.4 | Not recorded | 68fa75d71e209131cea6a300 |

### TAPADL-FAN

Clean Accuracy: 84.3. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195953.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70821e209131cea4b9e2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":50.7,"FLOPS (G)":11.8,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FAN-B-AdaNCA

Clean Accuracy: 84.1. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195954.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":51.7,"FLOPS (G)":12.4,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FAN-B

Clean Accuracy: 83.9. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195952.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6dd71e209131cea3c53f.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/NVlabs/FAN>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":50.4,"FLOPS (G)":11.7,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Swin-B-AdaNCA

Clean Accuracy: 83.7. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195957.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":90.7,"FLOPS (G)":16.3,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Swin-B

Clean Accuracy: 83.4. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195955.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a8c1e209131cea28b62.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/microsoft/Swin-Transformer>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":87.8,"FLOPS (G)":15.4,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RVT-B-AdaNCA

Clean Accuracy: 83.3. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195951.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":91,"FLOPS (G)":19,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Swin-B

Clean Accuracy: 83.3. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195956.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a8c1e209131cea28b62.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/microsoft/Swin-Transformer>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":94.1,"FLOPS (G)":16.7,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-22K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConViT-B-AdaNCA

Clean Accuracy: 83.2. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c31484919595a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":89,"FLOPS (G)":19,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TAPADL-RVT

Clean Accuracy: 83.1. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195950.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70821e209131cea4b9e2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":89.4,"FLOPS (G)":17.9,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### RVT-B

Clean Accuracy: 82.7. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c31484919594f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c961e209131cea34ab0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":88.5,"FLOPS (G)":17.7,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConViT-B

Clean Accuracy: 82.7. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195959.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e1e1e209131cea3de6e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/facebookresearch/convit>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":93.6,"FLOPS (G)":19.2,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-22K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ConViT-B

Clean Accuracy: 82.4. Result ID: 6993e7b93a6c314849195958.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75d71e209131cea6a300.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e1e1e209131cea3de6e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/facebookresearch/convit>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Params (M)":86.5,"FLOPS (G)":17.7,"Pre-training":"ImageNet-1K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
