# Image Classification on ImageNet-1k (Accuracy and Robustness Metrics)

Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet-1k (Accuracy and Robustness Metrics)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-accuracy-and-robustness-metrics>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-23T08:52:31.308Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the ImageNet-1k dataset, reporting results for Completeness (Accuracy) and Soundness (Robustness).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet-1k |
| Metric | Completeness (Accuracy) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Completeness (Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-accuracy-and-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Completeness%20(Accuracy)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Soundness (Robustness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-imagenet-1k-accuracy-and-robustness-metrics.md?metric=Soundness%20(Robustness)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Completeness (Accuracy) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ResNet-50 | 76.01 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| CBM (nonlin.) | 69.02 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| CBM | 68.59 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| NCV | 67.04 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| Pixel-MAC | 35.06 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |

### ResNet-50

Completeness (Accuracy): 76.01. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e1f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62321e209131ce9f8328.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"pixel space"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CBM (nonlin.)

Completeness (Accuracy): 69.02. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e20.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"SpLiCE"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CBM

Completeness (Accuracy): 68.59. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e22.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68f91e209131cea1f6a0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"SpLiCE"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NCV

Completeness (Accuracy): 67.04. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e23.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"CLIP-Sim"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Pixel-MAC

Completeness (Accuracy): 35.06. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e21.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa729e1e209131cea57953.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"pixel space"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.