# Image Classification on ImageNet-100 1.0 (test) Source: [Image Classification on ImageNet-100 1.0 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:38:30.091Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of ImageNet-100 version 1.0, measured using feature similarity metrics derived from models like CLIP, DINO-v2, and EVA-02. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet-100 1.0 (test) | | Metric | CLIP Score | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [CLIP Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [DINO-v2 Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [EVA-02 Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [MoCo-v3 Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Average Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | CLIP Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Full Dataset | 92.5 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | Ours (SFM+CI) | 92.2 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | Ours (SFM) | 86.7 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | LGM | 84.9 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | Centroids | 77.1 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | Neighbors (SFM) | 72.2 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | Neighbors (LGM) | 67.8 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | | Random | 56.6 | Not recorded | 69857586c97a0b3e3b5d5c3c | ### Full Dataset CLIP Score: 92.5. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1dee. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"Full"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Ours (SFM+CI) CLIP Score: 92.2. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1ded. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Ours (SFM) CLIP Score: 86.7. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1dec. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LGM CLIP Score: 84.9. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1deb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Centroids CLIP Score: 77.1. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1de8. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Neighbors (SFM) CLIP Score: 72.2. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1dea. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Neighbors (LGM) CLIP Score: 67.8. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1de9. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Random CLIP Score: 56.6. Result ID: 69973e865698665ec48f1de7. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Train Set":"1 Img/Cls"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.