# Image Classification on ILSVRC 2012 (test) with Certified Accuracy

Source: [Image Classification on ILSVRC 2012 (test) with Certified Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-ilsvrc-2012-test-with-certified-accuracy>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:39:15.504Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the ILSVRC 2012 dataset, specifically measuring certified accuracy under varying levels of pixel perturbation.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ILSVRC 2012 (test) |
| Metric | Clean Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Clean Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-ilsvrc-2012-test-with-certified-accuracy.md?metric=Clean%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Certified Acc (1% pixels)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-ilsvrc-2012-test-with-certified-accuracy.md?metric=Certified%20Acc%20(1%25%20pixels)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Certified Acc (2% pixels)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-ilsvrc-2012-test-with-certified-accuracy.md?metric=Certified%20Acc%20(2%25%20pixels)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Certified Acc (3% pixels)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-ilsvrc-2012-test-with-certified-accuracy.md?metric=Certified%20Acc%20(3%25%20pixels)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Clean Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ECViT-B | 78.58 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| ECViT-S | 69.88 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| DS | 64.67 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| PG | 55.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| PG | 54.6 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| PG | 54.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| CBN | 49.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |
| BagCert | 46 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6 |

### ECViT-B

Clean Accuracy: 78.58. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea23.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B","b (band size)":37}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ECViT-S

Clean Accuracy: 69.88. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea22.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-S","b (band size)":37}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DS

Clean Accuracy: 64.67. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea20.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa690b1e209131cea1fada.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PG

Clean Accuracy: 55.1. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea1d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69b11e209131cea23729.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Target patch size":"1% pixels"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PG

Clean Accuracy: 54.6. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea1e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69b11e209131cea23729.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Target patch size":"2% pixels"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PG

Clean Accuracy: 54.1. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea1f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69b11e209131cea23729.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Target patch size":"3% pixels"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CBN

Clean Accuracy: 49.5. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea1c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BagCert

Clean Accuracy: 46. Result ID: 698eb368ffc3901de09fea21.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfc1e209131cea316e6.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69351e209131cea20d36.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
