# Image Classification on FMNIST (test) with Alpha-Weighted Accuracy

Source: [Image Classification on FMNIST (test) with Alpha-Weighted Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fmnist-test-with-alpha-weighted-accuracy>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-16T08:54:50.267Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the Fashion MNIST dataset, specifically reporting accuracy metrics weighted by alpha values (0.1, 1.0, and 10.0).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | FMNIST (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (alpha=0.1) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (alpha=0.1)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fmnist-test-with-alpha-weighted-accuracy.md?metric=Accuracy%20(alpha%3D0.1)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (alpha=1.0)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fmnist-test-with-alpha-weighted-accuracy.md?metric=Accuracy%20(alpha%3D1.0)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (alpha=10.0)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fmnist-test-with-alpha-weighted-accuracy.md?metric=Accuracy%20(alpha%3D10.0)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (alpha=0.1) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FedAvg | 89.02 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| CA-HFP | 89 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| FedProx | 86.65 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| FedProx | 85.46 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| CA-HFP | 80.9 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| FedAvg | 80.8 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| PruneFL | 77.08 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| PruneFL | 73.9 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| DapperFL | 73.53 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| FedMP | 73.34 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| FedMP | 67.49 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |
| DapperFL | 59.6 | Not recorded | 69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03 |

### FedAvg

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 89.02. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b5c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG 16","Parameters Up /Down":"15.1 /15.1 M","FLOPs":"40.3 G","Sys. Heter.":"×"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CA-HFP

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 89. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b61.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG 16","Parameters Up /Down":"3.95 /3.95 M","FLOPs":"10.2 G","Sys. Heter.":"✓"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedProx

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 86.65. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b63.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67701e209131cea163fe.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"Resnet 32","Parameters Up /Down":"466 /466 K","FLOPs":"4.45 G","Sys. Heter.":"×"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedProx

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 85.46. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b5d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67701e209131cea163fe.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG 16","Parameters Up /Down":"15.1 /15.1 M","FLOPs":"20.2 G","Sys. Heter.":"×"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CA-HFP

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 80.9. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b67.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"Resnet 32","Parameters Up /Down":"254 /254 K","FLOPs":"5.20 G","Sys. Heter.":"✓"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvg

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 80.8. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b62.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"Resnet 32","Parameters Up /Down":"466 /466 K","FLOPs":"9.01 G","Sys. Heter.":"×"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PruneFL

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 77.08. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b5e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c2c1e209131cea32876.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG 16","Parameters Up /Down":"4.30 /4.30 M","FLOPs":"20.1 G","Sys. Heter.":"×"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PruneFL

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 73.9. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b64.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c2c1e209131cea32876.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"Resnet 32","Parameters Up /Down":"261 /261 K","FLOPs":"5.45 G","Sys. Heter.":"×"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DapperFL

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 73.53. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b66.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa760c1e209131cea6b1bc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"Resnet 32","Parameters Up /Down":"254 /466 K","FLOPs":"5.23 G","Sys. Heter.":"✓"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedMP

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 73.34. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b5f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG 16","Parameters Up /Down":"3.95 /3.95 M","FLOPs":"10.2 G","Sys. Heter.":"✓"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedMP

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 67.49. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b65.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"Resnet 32","Parameters Up /Down":"254 /254 K","FLOPs":"5.20 G","Sys. Heter.":"✓"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DapperFL

Accuracy (alpha=0.1): 59.6. Result ID: 69b7c54347f34ce9249f8b60.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b78e580636e5bf4afbda03.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa760c1e209131cea6b1bc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG 16","Parameters Up /Down":"3.95 /15.1 M","FLOPs":"10.3 G","Sys. Heter.":"✓"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
