# Image Classification on Flower102 Source: [Image Classification on Flower102]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-04-23T07:35:04.285Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Flower102 dataset, reporting Clean Accuracy scores. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Flower102 | | Metric | Clean Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Clean Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Clean Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | CLIP | 65.6 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | CLIP | 65.34 | Not recorded | 69cca6c30636e5bf4afcbd96 | | Ours | 60.82 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | Ours | 60.32 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | AoS | 59.69 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | FARE | 58.72 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | GLADIATOR | 56.77 | Not recorded | 69cca6c30636e5bf4afcbd96 | | AGFT | 54.89 | Not recorded | 69cca6c30636e5bf4afcbd96 | | PMG-FT | 53.39 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | PMG-AFT | 52.79 | Not recorded | 69cca6c30636e5bf4afcbd96 | | TeCoA | 51.31 | Not recorded | 69cca6c30636e5bf4afcbd96 | | TeCoA | 45.15 | Not recorded | 69e85bd47d0172140ec81123 | | TGA-ZSR | 44.19 | Not recorded | 69cca6c30636e5bf4afcbd96 | ### CLIP Clean Accuracy: 65.6. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dbe. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2021"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CLIP Clean Accuracy: 65.34. Result ID: 69ccd3dc47f34ce924b66a51. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B/32","Evaluation Protocol":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Ours Clean Accuracy: 60.82. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dc4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Configuration":"5 trees"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Ours Clean Accuracy: 60.32. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dc3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Configuration":"1 tree"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AoS Clean Accuracy: 59.69. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dc2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2025"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FARE Clean Accuracy: 58.72. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dc1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GLADIATOR Clean Accuracy: 56.77. Result ID: 69ccd3dc47f34ce924b66a55. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B/32","Evaluation Protocol":"Zero-shot","Training Strategy":"Adversarially fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AGFT Clean Accuracy: 54.89. Result ID: 69ccd3dc47f34ce924b66a56. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B/32","Evaluation Protocol":"Zero-shot","Training Strategy":"Adversarially fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PMG-FT Clean Accuracy: 53.39. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dc0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2024"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PMG-AFT Clean Accuracy: 52.79. Result ID: 69ccd3dc47f34ce924b66a53. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B/32","Evaluation Protocol":"Zero-shot","Training Strategy":"Adversarially fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TeCoA Clean Accuracy: 51.31. Result ID: 69ccd3dc47f34ce924b66a52. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B/32","Evaluation Protocol":"Zero-shot","Training Strategy":"Adversarially fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TeCoA Clean Accuracy: 45.15. Result ID: 69e9cb8a47f34ce924d09dbf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Year":"2023"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TGA-ZSR Clean Accuracy: 44.19. Result ID: 69ccd3dc47f34ce924b66a54. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ViT-B/32","Evaluation Protocol":"Zero-shot","Training Strategy":"Adversarially fine-tuned"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.