# Image Classification on FashionMNIST (SLS)

Source: [Image Classification on FashionMNIST (SLS)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fashionmnist-sls>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-20T07:23:37.271Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the FashionMNIST (SLS) dataset, reporting standard accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | FashionMNIST (SLS) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-fashionmnist-sls.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CFFL | 88.13 | Not recorded | 6a0d4016f984739ed6737804 |
| CELM | 87 | Not recorded | 6a0d4016f984739ed6737804 |
| ShapFed | 84.17 | Not recorded | 6a0d4016f984739ed6737804 |
| FedAvg | 83.13 | Not recorded | 6a0d4016f984739ed6737804 |
| CGSV | 55.39 | Not recorded | 6a0d4016f984739ed6737804 |

### CFFL

Accuracy: 88.13. Result ID: 6a0d608ffbc373592c04fef7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a0d4016f984739ed6737804.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68331e209131cea1ab85.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CELM

Accuracy: 87. Result ID: 6a0d608ffbc373592c04fefa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a0d4016f984739ed6737804.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a0d4016f984739ed6737804.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ShapFed

Accuracy: 84.17. Result ID: 6a0d608ffbc373592c04fef9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a0d4016f984739ed6737804.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73731e209131cea5c987.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvg

Accuracy: 83.13. Result ID: 6a0d608ffbc373592c04fef6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a0d4016f984739ed6737804.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CGSV

Accuracy: 55.39. Result ID: 6a0d608ffbc373592c04fef8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a0d4016f984739ed6737804.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
