# Image Classification on Fashion-MNIST Label Skew K=2 Source: [Image Classification on Fashion-MNIST Label Skew K=2]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-25T07:27:11.618Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Fashion-MNIST dataset variant characterized by a Label Skew of K=2. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Fashion-MNIST Label Skew K=2 | | Metric | Top-1 Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 6 of 6 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Top-1 Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Top-1 Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | FedRep | 92.64 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 | | FibFL++ | 91.9 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 | | RDFL | 91.23 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 | | FibFL | 89.2 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 | | FibFL+ | 89.17 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 | | FedAvg | 88.72 | Not recorded | 6a13d7826f71c5ae7dc9e822 | ### FedRep Top-1 Accuracy: 92.64. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac58f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N (Number of clients)":"10","R (Communication rounds)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FibFL++ Top-1 Accuracy: 91.9. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac593. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N (Number of clients)":"10","R (Communication rounds)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RDFL Top-1 Accuracy: 91.23. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac590. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N (Number of clients)":"10","R (Communication rounds)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FibFL Top-1 Accuracy: 89.2. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac591. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N (Number of clients)":"10","R (Communication rounds)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FibFL+ Top-1 Accuracy: 89.17. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac592. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N (Number of clients)":"10","R (Communication rounds)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FedAvg Top-1 Accuracy: 88.72. Result ID: 6a13f9b2fbc373592c0ac58e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N (Number of clients)":"10","R (Communication rounds)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.