# Image Classification on F-MNIST Rotated 90 synthetic (test)

Source: [Image Classification on F-MNIST Rotated 90 synthetic (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-f-mnist-rotated-90-synthetic-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:29:24.380Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the F-MNIST dataset, specifically using samples synthetically rotated by 90 degrees.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | F-MNIST Rotated 90 synthetic (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-f-mnist-rotated-90-synthetic-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Resilient | 86.48 | Not recorded | 68fa71d41e209131cea53392 |
| Constrained | 85.66 | Not recorded | 68fa71d41e209131cea53392 |
| Unconstrained | 81.57 | Not recorded | 68fa71d41e209131cea53392 |
| Augerino | 81.48 | Not recorded | 68fa71d41e209131cea53392 |

### Resilient

Accuracy: 86.48. Result ID: 6991fd983a6c3148490be2ab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71d41e209131cea53392.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71d41e209131cea53392.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"invariance constraint level (epsilon\_L)":"0.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Constrained

Accuracy: 85.66. Result ID: 6991fd983a6c3148490be2aa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71d41e209131cea53392.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"invariance constraint level (epsilon\_L)":"0.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Unconstrained

Accuracy: 81.57. Result ID: 6991fd983a6c3148490be2a9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71d41e209131cea53392.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"invariance constraint level (epsilon\_L)":"0.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Augerino

Accuracy: 81.48. Result ID: 6991fd983a6c3148490be2a8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71d41e209131cea53392.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"invariance constraint level (epsilon\_L)":"0.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.