# Image Classification on DTD (Transfer, Average, Last Scores) Source: [Image Classification on DTD (Transfer, Average, Last Scores)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-12T07:37:05.843Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Describable Textures Dataset (DTD), reporting transfer, average, and final performance scores. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | DTD | | Metric | Average Score | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Average Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Transfer Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Last Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Average Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Individual FT | 65.1 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | ConDU (LoRA) | 58.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | MoE | 58.7 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | ConDU (FT) | 58.3 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | WiSE-FT | 55.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | ZSCL | 53.5 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | Continual FT | 52.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | | Zero-shot | 44.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77941e209131cea741ae | ### Individual FT Average Score: 65.1. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Adaptation strategy":"Individual Fine-tuning"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConDU (LoRA) Average Score: 58.8. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Adaptation strategy":"LoRA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MoE Average Score: 58.7. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Continual learning method":"MoE"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConDU (FT) Average Score: 58.3. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Adaptation strategy":"Fine-tuning"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### WiSE-FT Average Score: 55.8. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Adaptation strategy":"WiSE-FT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ZSCL Average Score: 53.5. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Continual learning method":"ZSCL"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Continual FT Average Score: 52.8. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Adaptation strategy":"Continual Fine-tuning"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Zero-shot Average Score: 44.6. Result ID: 69b26d106dbb7075b95cb3f1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Adaptation strategy":"Zero-shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.