# Image Classification on CUB (Accuracy and Sparsity)

Source: [Image Classification on CUB (Accuracy and Sparsity)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cub-accuracy-and-sparsity>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:29:49.182Z

Evaluation of standard Image Classification performance on the CUB dataset, reporting classification accuracy and model sparsity.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CUB |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cub-accuracy-and-sparsity.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Sparsity](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cub-accuracy-and-sparsity.md?metric=Sparsity>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CLIP Embeddings-H | 81.9 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-H | 80.3 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CF-CBM-H | 79.5 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-H | 78.9 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| Baseline (Images) | 76.7 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| Label-Free CBMs | 74.59 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CF-CBM-L | 73.2 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-L | 59.62 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CLIP Embeddings-L | 47.8 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |
| CDM-L | 39.05 | Not recorded | 68fa73d51e209131cea5e622 |

### CLIP Embeddings-H

Accuracy: 81.9. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Non-Interpretable","Concepts":false,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-H

Accuracy: 80.3. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CF-CBM-H

Accuracy: 79.5. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-H

Accuracy: 78.9. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Baseline (Images)

Accuracy: 76.7. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6fa01e209131cea46b96.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Non-Interpretable","Concepts":false,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Label-Free CBMs

Accuracy: 74.59. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6fa01e209131cea46b96.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Whole Image High Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CF-CBM-L

Accuracy: 73.2. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Patches Low Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-L

Accuracy: 59.62. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Patches Low Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CLIP Embeddings-L

Accuracy: 47.8. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69581e209131cea21ad0.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenAI/CLIP>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Non-Interpretable","Concepts":false,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CDM-L

Accuracy: 39.05. Result ID: 69930dd13a6c314849135ff7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73d51e209131cea5e622.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70621e209131cea4ac77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Architecture Type":"Concept-Based Patches Low Level","Concepts":true,"Sparsity Optimized":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
