# Image Classification on Corrupted CIFAR10 (unbiased)

Source: [Image Classification on Corrupted CIFAR10 (unbiased)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-corrupted-cifar10-unbiased>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:33:01.865Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the unbiased version of the Corrupted CIFAR-10 dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Corrupted CIFAR10 (unbiased) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 16 of 16 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-corrupted-cifar10-unbiased.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ReBias | 45.49 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 42.32 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 41.62 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 35.68 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 35.25 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 35.23 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 32.54 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| ReBias | 31.52 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 29.68 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 29.27 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 29.11 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 27.1 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| ReBias | 25.04 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 24.51 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 23.12 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| ReBias | 20.49 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |

### ReBias

Accuracy: 45.49. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 42.32. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 41.62. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 35.68. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605ef.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 35.25. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 35.23. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 32.54. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605fa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Accuracy: 31.52. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 29.68. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 29.27. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 29.11. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605fe.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 27.1. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605fd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Accuracy: 25.04. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 24.51. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605f7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 23.12. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605fb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Accuracy: 20.49. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605fc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
