# Image Classification on Corrupted CIFAR10 (bias-guiding) Source: [Image Classification on Corrupted CIFAR10 (bias-guiding)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:33:01.847Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the Corrupted CIFAR-10 dataset variant specifically configured with bias-guiding corruption. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Corrupted CIFAR10 (bias-guiding) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 16 of 16 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ReBias | 99.29 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | ReBias | 99.11 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | Vanilla | 99.05 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | Vanilla | 98.97 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | Vanilla | 98.79 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | ReBias | 98.67 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | Vanilla | 98.56 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | ReBias | 98.23 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | BiaSwap | 96.98 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | BiaSwap | 96.82 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | BiaSwap | 95.53 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | BiaSwap | 94.82 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | LfF | 80.9 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | LfF | 74.73 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | LfF | 73.41 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | | LfF | 62.74 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e | ### ReBias Accuracy: 99.29. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605ec. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReBias Accuracy: 99.11. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Vanilla Accuracy: 99.05. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605df. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Vanilla Accuracy: 98.97. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Vanilla Accuracy: 98.79. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e7. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReBias Accuracy: 98.67. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Vanilla Accuracy: 98.56. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605eb. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReBias Accuracy: 98.23. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BiaSwap Accuracy: 96.98. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605ea. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BiaSwap Accuracy: 96.82. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605ee. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BiaSwap Accuracy: 95.53. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BiaSwap Accuracy: 94.82. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LfF Accuracy: 80.9. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605ed. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LfF Accuracy: 74.73. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LfF Accuracy: 73.41. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LfF Accuracy: 62.74. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605e1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.