# Image Classification on Colored MNIST (unbiased)

Source: [Image Classification on Colored MNIST (unbiased)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-colored-mnist-unbiased>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:33:01.828Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the unbiased version of the Colored MNIST dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Colored MNIST (unbiased) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 16 of 16 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-colored-mnist-unbiased.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ReBias | 0.9628 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 0.9085 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| ReBias | 0.9016 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 0.8576 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 0.8529 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 0.8472 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| ReBias | 0.8419 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| BiaSwap | 0.8374 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 0.7954 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 0.7588 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 0.7005 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| ReBias | 0.6282 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 0.6262 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| LfF | 0.6161 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 0.4876 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |
| Vanilla | 0.3267 | Not recorded | 68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e |

### ReBias

Accuracy: 0.9628. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 0.9085. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Accuracy: 0.9016. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 0.8576. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605de.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 0.8529. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 0.8472. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Accuracy: 0.8419. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BiaSwap

Accuracy: 0.8374. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605da.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 0.7954. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605cf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"95.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 0.7588. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 0.7005. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ReBias

Accuracy: 0.6282. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605dc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18dcf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"requires bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 0.6262. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"98.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LfF

Accuracy: 0.6161. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605dd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68c11e209131cea1e11f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"does not require bias type"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 0.4876. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605d7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.0%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Vanilla

Accuracy: 0.3267. Result ID: 699ac79a5698665ec45605db.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a9a1e209131cea2946e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"bias\_ratio":"99.5%","supervision":"none"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
