# Image Classification on Colored Fashion MNIST (train) Source: [Image Classification on Colored Fashion MNIST (train)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:36.687Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the training split of the Colored Fashion MNIST dataset. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Colored Fashion MNIST (train) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 9 of 9 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ERM 2 | 84.39 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | ERM | 83.17 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | ROBUST MIN MAX | 82.81 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | ERM 1 | 81.33 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | IRM | 75.01 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | OPTIMAL | 75 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | ERM GRAYSCALE | 74.79 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | V-IRM GAME | 68.96 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | | F-IRM GAME | 62.31 | Not recorded | 68fa67361e209131cea14d1e | ### ERM 2 Accuracy: 84.39. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae1. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"environment":"2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Accuracy: 83.17. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2adf. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ROBUST MIN MAX Accuracy: 82.81. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM 1 Accuracy: 81.33. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae0. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"environment":"1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### IRM Accuracy: 75.01. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OPTIMAL Accuracy: 75. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae7. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM GRAYSCALE Accuracy: 74.79. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae6. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"data\_preprocessing":"grayscale"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### V-IRM GAME Accuracy: 68.96. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### F-IRM GAME Accuracy: 62.31. Result ID: 698d1f2e8b517eb4331f2ae3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.