# Image Classification on CIFAR10C 50% bias-conflicting ratio (test) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR10C 50% bias-conflicting ratio (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:30:05.865Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of the CIFAR10C dataset configured with a 50% bias-conflicting ratio. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR10C 50% bias-conflicting ratio (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | BCSI | 72.79 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | ERM | 71.33 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | BCSI | 70.61 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | BCSI | 66.45 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | DFA | 65.97 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | BCSI | 65.82 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | SelecMix | 62.52 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | | LfF | 60.35 | Not recorded | 68fa75761e209131cea681a0 | ### BCSI Accuracy: 72.79. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a1c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"base\_method":"DFA"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Accuracy: 71.33. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a16. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BCSI Accuracy: 70.61. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a1a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"base\_method":"ERM"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BCSI Accuracy: 66.45. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a1d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"base\_method":"SelecMix"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DFA Accuracy: 65.97. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a18. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BCSI Accuracy: 65.82. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a1b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"base\_method":"LfF"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SelecMix Accuracy: 62.52. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a19. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LfF Accuracy: 60.35. Result ID: 6993c3b23a6c314849185a17. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.