# Image Classification on CIFAR10 (test) (Accuracy vs Corruption Severity) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR10 (test) (Accuracy vs Corruption Severity)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:26.745Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, measuring averaged accuracy across six distinct levels of input perturbation severity (0 through 5). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR10 (test) | | Metric | Accuracy (Severity 0) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 6 of 6 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (Severity 0)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Severity 1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Severity 2)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Severity 3)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Severity 4)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Severity 5)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (Severity 0) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | SharpDRO | 91.9 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | JTT | 91.3 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | SharpDRO | 91.2 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | EIIL | 90.3 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | JTT | 89.9 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | | EIIL | 88.6 | Not recorded | 69535c9a53fdd5c36173db85 | ### SharpDRO Accuracy (Severity 0): 91.9. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c46. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### JTT Accuracy (Severity 0): 91.3. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c44. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SharpDRO Accuracy (Severity 0): 91.2. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c43. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Gaussian"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EIIL Accuracy (Severity 0): 90.3. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c45. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Shot"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### JTT Accuracy (Severity 0): 89.9. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c41. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Gaussian"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EIIL Accuracy (Severity 0): 88.6. Result ID: 6999344b5698665ec49d5c42. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Corruption Type":"Gaussian"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.