# Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (test) (Accuracy vs FLOPs Budget)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (test) (Accuracy vs FLOPs Budget)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-vs-flops-budget>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-08T07:27:02.616Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-100 test set, reporting Top-1 accuracy measured at specific computational budgets defined by FLOPs percentages (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 (test) |
| Metric | Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 12 of 12 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-vs-flops-budget.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(25%25%20FLOPs)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (50% FLOPs)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-vs-flops-budget.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(50%25%20FLOPs)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (75% FLOPs)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-vs-flops-budget.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(75%25%20FLOPs)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Top-1 Accuracy (100% FLOPs)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-vs-flops-budget.md?metric=Top-1%20Accuracy%20(100%25%20FLOPs)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| LwF | 0.7071 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| EWC | 0.705 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| LwF | 0.665 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Separate | 0.6625 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Joint | 0.6593 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| EWC | 0.651 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Separate | 0.649 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Branch-wise | 0.6419 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Joint | 0.6284 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Branch-wise | 0.5824 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Disjoint | 0.5674 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |
| Disjoint | 0.5257 | Not recorded | 69fd6de45497b3b670c89276 |

### LwF

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.7071. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ResNet-34","lambda":"100","rho":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EWC

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.705. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ResNet-34","lambda":"100","rho":"0.7"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LwF

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.665. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02dfd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"MSDNet","lambda":"1000","rho":"0.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Separate

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.6625. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ResNet-34"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Joint

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.6593. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02dfb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"MSDNet"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EWC

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.651. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02dfc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"MSDNet","lambda":"1000","rho":"0.2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Separate

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.649. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02dfa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"MSDNet"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Branch-wise

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.6419. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ResNet-34"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Joint

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.6284. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ResNet-34"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Branch-wise

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.5824. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"MSDNet"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Disjoint

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.5674. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"MSDNet"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Disjoint

Top-1 Accuracy (25% FLOPs): 0.5257. Result ID: 69fd8fe547f34ce924e02df2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69fd6de45497b3b670c89276.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79931e209131cea7e5e7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ResNet-34"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
