# Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (test) (Accuracy at ε=0.4 and ε=0.6 Noise)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (test) (Accuracy at ε=0.4 and ε=0.6 Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-at-0-4-and-0-6-noise>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:34.635Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-100 test set, specifically reporting accuracy metrics under uniform noise levels corresponding to ε=0.4 and ε=0.6.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (ε=0.4) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (ε=0.4)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-at-0-4-and-0-6-noise.md?metric=Accuracy%20(%CE%B5%3D0.4)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (ε=0.6)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-test-accuracy-at-0-4-and-0-6-noise.md?metric=Accuracy%20(%CE%B5%3D0.6)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (ε=0.4) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| CORES2 | 72.22 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| SELF | 66.71 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| NLNL | 66.39 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| Lq | 61.77 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| Forward T | 53.04 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| LDMI | 52.32 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| Cross Entropy | 48.2 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |
| MAE | 7.68 | Not recorded | 68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b |

### CORES2

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 72.22. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234439.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/cores>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SELF

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 66.71. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234438.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66761e209131cea10452.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NLNL

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 66.39. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234437.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66371e209131cea0edb3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Lq

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 61.77. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234435.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa651f1e209131cea088eb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Forward T

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 53.04. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234434.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63321e209131ce9fd4c8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LDMI

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 52.32. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234436.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa669b1e209131cea1159a.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Newbeeer/L_DMI>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Cross Entropy

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 48.2. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234432.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa631e1e209131ce9fcf46.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MAE

Accuracy (ε=0.4): 7.68. Result ID: 698db6708b517eb433234433.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa698f1e209131cea22a5b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63e81e209131cea0158c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
