# Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (Rounds to Target Accuracy)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (Rounds to Target Accuracy)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-rounds-to-target-accuracy>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-27T09:04:33.290Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-100 dataset, focusing on convergence speed metrics, specifically the number of training rounds required to reach predefined accuracy thresholds (e.g., 52% and 58% accuracy).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 |
| Metric | Accuracy at 500 Rounds |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 13 of 13 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy at 500 Rounds](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-rounds-to-target-accuracy.md?metric=Accuracy%20at%20500%20Rounds>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy at 1000 Rounds](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-rounds-to-target-accuracy.md?metric=Accuracy%20at%201000%20Rounds>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Rounds to reach 52% Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-rounds-to-target-accuracy.md?metric=Rounds%20to%20reach%2052%25%20Accuracy>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Rounds to reach 58% Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-rounds-to-target-accuracy.md?metric=Rounds%20to%20reach%2058%25%20Accuracy>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy at 500 Rounds | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FedACG | 59.82 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| MOON | 58.5 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedCM | 57.1 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedDC | 55.17 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedADAM | 52.23 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedDyn | 50.37 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedMLB | 50.12 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedAvgM | 47.43 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedDecorr | 45.16 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedNTD | 44.93 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedAvg | 43.96 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedLC | 43.84 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedProx | 43.57 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |

### FedACG

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 59.82. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6965b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/ninigapa0/FedAGM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MOON

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 58.5. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69654.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fca.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/QinbinLi/MOON>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedCM

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 57.1. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69655.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a3d1e209131cea26ed8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedDC

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 55.17. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69659.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0d1e209131cea31b80.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/gaoliang13/FedDC>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedADAM

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 52.23. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69652.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa58711e209131ce9ae27a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedDyn

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 50.37. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69653.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b361e209131cea2cecf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedMLB

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 50.12. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69656.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d031e209131cea3754a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvgM

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 47.43. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69651.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66581e209131cea0faa1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedDecorr

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 45.16. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6965a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72d61e209131cea58d02.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedNTD

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 44.93. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69658.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e061e209131cea3d7a5.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Lee-Gihun/FedNTD>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvg

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 43.96. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6964f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedLC

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 43.84. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69657.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d851e209131cea3a601.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedProx

Accuracy at 500 Rounds: 43.57. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69650.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67701e209131cea163fe.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
