# Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (Label Subset Evaluation) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (Label Subset Evaluation)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:42:21.693Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-100 dataset, specifically measuring error rates across different subsets of labels (400, 2500, and 10000 labels). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 | | Metric | Error Rate (10000 Labels) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 14 of 14 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Error Rate (10000 Labels)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Error Rate (400 Labels)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Error Rate (2500 Labels)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Error Rate (10000 Labels) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Fully-Supervised | 19.3 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | ReMixMatch | 20.04 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | SimMatch + EPASS | 21.32 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | SimMatch | 21.5 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | FlexMatch | 21.75 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | FreeMatch | 21.81 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | SoftMatch | 21.86 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | Dash | 21.89 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | AdaMatch | 21.99 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | FixMatch | 22.06 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | CoMatch | 22.11 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | CoMatch + EPASS | 22.16 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | UDA | 23.59 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | | MixMatch | 33.22 | Not recorded | 68fa70f11e209131cea4e324 | ### Fully-Supervised Error Rate (10000 Labels): 19.3. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db1e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ReMixMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 20.04. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db13. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimMatch + EPASS Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.32. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db1d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.5. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db18. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FlexMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.75. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db15. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FreeMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.81. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db1a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SoftMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.86. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db1b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Dash Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.89. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db16. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AdaMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 21.99. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db19. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FixMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 22.06. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db14. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CoMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 22.11. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db17. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CoMatch + EPASS Error Rate (10000 Labels): 22.16. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db1c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UDA Error Rate (10000 Labels): 23.59. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db11. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MixMatch Error Rate (10000 Labels): 33.22. Result ID: 699165213a6c31484907db12. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.