# Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (Completeness and Soundness)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-100 (Completeness and Soundness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-completeness-and-soundness>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-23T08:52:31.286Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-100 dataset, focusing on Completeness (Accuracy) and Soundness (Robustness) metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 |
| Metric | Completeness Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Completeness Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-completeness-and-soundness.md?metric=Completeness%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Soundness Robustness](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-100-completeness-and-soundness.md?metric=Soundness%20Robustness>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Completeness Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| NCV | 83.32 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| ResNet-50 | 81.45 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| CBM (nonlin.) | 79.29 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| CBM | 75.42 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |
| Pixel-MAC | 15.27 | Not recorded | 68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b |

### NCV

Completeness Accuracy: 83.32. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e1e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"CLIP-Sim"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ResNet-50

Completeness Accuracy: 81.45. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e1a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62321e209131ce9f8328.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"pixel space"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CBM (nonlin.)

Completeness Accuracy: 79.29. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e1b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"SpLiCE"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CBM

Completeness Accuracy: 75.42. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e1d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68f91e209131cea1f6a0.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"SpLiCE"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Pixel-MAC

Completeness Accuracy: 15.27. Result ID: 6a3a4940fbc373592c352e1c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa79fa1e209131cea8064b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa729e1e209131cea57953.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Feature Space":"pixel space"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.