# Image Classification on CIFAR-100 80% noise (test) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-100 80% noise (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:52.219Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of CIFAR-100 corrupted with exactly 80% noise. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 80% noise (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 20 of 20 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | DM-AugDesc-WS-WAW | 66.4 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | DM-AugDesc-WS-WAW | 66.1 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | DM-AugDesc-WS-SAW | 61.8 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | DM-AugDesc-WS-SAW | 61.6 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Li et al. \[14\] | 60.2 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Li et al. \[14\] | 59.6 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Arazo et al. | 48.2 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Arazo et al. | 47.6 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Li et al. \[15\] | 42.4 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Li et al. \[15\] | 40.1 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Yi & Wu | 31.1 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Zhang et al. | 30.8 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Yu et al. | 27.9 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Yi & Wu | 20.7 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Cross-Entropy | 19.9 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Reed et al. | 19.9 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Zhang et al. | 17.6 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Yu et al. | 15.5 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Reed et al. | 8.9 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | | Cross-Entropy | 8.8 | Not recorded | 68fa69b21e209131cea2384c | ### DM-AugDesc-WS-WAW Accuracy: 66.4. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902cc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DM-AugDesc-WS-WAW Accuracy: 66.1. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902cd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DM-AugDesc-WS-SAW Accuracy: 61.8. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902ca. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DM-AugDesc-WS-SAW Accuracy: 61.6. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902cb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Li et al. \[14\] Accuracy: 60.2. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Li et al. \[14\] Accuracy: 59.6. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Arazo et al. Accuracy: 48.2. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Arazo et al. Accuracy: 47.6. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Li et al. \[15\] Accuracy: 42.4. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Li et al. \[15\] Accuracy: 40.1. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yi & Wu Accuracy: 31.1. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Zhang et al. Accuracy: 30.8. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yu et al. Accuracy: 27.9. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902be. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yi & Wu Accuracy: 20.7. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Cross-Entropy Accuracy: 19.9. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902ba. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Reed et al. Accuracy: 19.9. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902bc. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Best"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Zhang et al. Accuracy: 17.6. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902c1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yu et al. Accuracy: 15.5. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902bf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Reed et al. Accuracy: 8.9. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902bd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Cross-Entropy Accuracy: 8.8. Result ID: 698dd794ffc3901de09902bb. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model Selection":"Last"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.